Security testing
From Linux NFS
(Difference between revisions)
(Fixing some spelling/grammar) |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* to list all NFS functions that could be used in a different way than designed | * to list all NFS functions that could be used in a different way than designed | ||
* to be sure data sent by a modified client / server could not be used to access a server/client (for example : can anyone modify delegated data to create a problem on the server? ) | * to be sure data sent by a modified client / server could not be used to access a server/client (for example : can anyone modify delegated data to create a problem on the server? ) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Security testing tools: | ||
+ | http://www.opensourcetesting.org/security.php |
Latest revision as of 04:29, 11 April 2006
There are mainly two way to view security on NFS :
- Functionality of security components: kerberos, spkm, lipkey ...
- Trust of NFSv4, with or without security components.
Each Security components (such as kerberos) should its own independant section. This section is on the second part : how can we be sure NFSv4 is secure. For now this page is mainly a reflection around this subject.
As far as I know there is one generic attack from a remote machine to a server. It uses buffers overflow/underflow to set excecutable code on the stack.
Others attacks are not generic, each attack depend on the imagination of the cracker :
- to use a function in a different way than the function was designed.
- to imitate the client or the server with a modified one.
In order to avoid security holes we need :
- to be sure the size of each buffer is checked
- to list all NFS functions that could be used in a different way than designed
- to be sure data sent by a modified client / server could not be used to access a server/client (for example : can anyone modify delegated data to create a problem on the server? )
Security testing tools:
http://www.opensourcetesting.org/security.php