Search results

Create the page "Users" on this wiki!

Page title matches

• NFS for AFS users
  ...to a traditional unix system it's more flexible about delegating rights to users to do stuff. ...umes, all the read-only volumes update simultaneously and atomically. The users, in theory, don't notice as the volumes don't go offline - and then they se
  13 KB (2,220 words) - 20:35, 27 January 2022

Page text matches

• 4.1 RDMA issues
  ...hould downgrade all 4.1 requests to 4.0 because this could be confusing to users.
  3 KB (434 words) - 20:49, 14 December 2010
• Enduser doc kerberos
  * '''Issue:''' Enabling users other than root to access the nfs4 mount, i.e. bob. The syslog (/var/log/m
  5 KB (813 words) - 09:42, 7 June 2010
• Matrix functional section
  |LDAP – ID mapping, authenticating users
  20 KB (2,640 words) - 13:12, 26 January 2006
• Matrix security section
  |Verify that only administrative users can access admin tools and config files
  7 KB (898 words) - 02:21, 19 August 2007
• ACLs
  ...r. However, this would prevent our ACLs from being enforced against local users of the same filesystem. ...against any NFSv4 server (even if the client doesn't know about all of the users on the server).
  15 KB (2,453 words) - 15:57, 10 July 2020
• NFS Howto Intro
  It will also not cover PC-NFS, which is considered obsolete (users are encouraged to use Samba to share files with Windows machines) or NFS Ve ...st mailto:nfs@lists.sourceforge.net. To best help the developers and other users help you assess your problem you should include:
  7 KB (1,146 words) - 17:05, 5 April 2006
• NFS Howto Server
  ...rns. On the other hand, home directories need to be exported read-write if users are to save work on them.
  16 KB (2,729 words) - 17:36, 5 April 2006
• NFS Howto Optimization
  ...block sizes and network packet size) are also powers of two. However, some users have reported better successes with block sizes that are not powers of two
  24 KB (4,096 words) - 21:31, 5 April 2006
• NFS Howto Security
  ...ld (not even a modem) and you trust all the internal machines and all your users then this section will be of no use to you. However, its our belief that th ...can still use '''su''' to become any other user and access and change that users files!" say you. To which the answer is: Yes, and that's the way it is, and
  25 KB (4,359 words) - 13:06, 6 April 2006
• NFS Howto Interop
  ...to requests from insecure ports (i.e., ports above 1024, to which non-root users can bind). Older versions of AIX do not seem to require this.
  10 KB (1,616 words) - 14:30, 6 April 2006
• Cluster Coherent NFSv4 and Share Reservations
  ACCESS reservations are familiar to Linux users, as they map directly to posix open() flags. NFSv4 ACCESS shares of READ,
  5 KB (878 words) - 15:16, 18 August 2021
• Server state
  ...; for example, it may not be possible to enforce NFSv4 ACLs when for local users on the server.
  4 KB (522 words) - 23:50, 21 July 2011
• To do
  ...ess the root filehandle, which is usually very easy). It's not clear that users realize this. Add code to exportfs to warn about suspicious-looking cases. * [[NFS for AFS users]]
  3 KB (448 words) - 15:03, 13 July 2020
• Pseudofilesystem improvements
  ...atively simple to implement, but has lead to severe problems for automount users, or for anyone attempting to migrate from NFSv2/v3 to v4, because v4 client
  5 KB (903 words) - 22:37, 23 August 2010
• MountNotes
  ...only mount options in the kernel option parser -- [no]quota, [no]user, [no]users, and so on. See utils/mount/mount.c for more. Hmm. Maybe this isn't neede ...ovide recommendations for various scenarios. One example might be "noauto,users,nosuid".
  13 KB (2,144 words) - 22:04, 21 August 2007
• ChucksProjects
  ...oo specific ("RPC Error: RPC program not available" is meaningless to most users)
  5 KB (694 words) - 16:19, 4 December 2007
• NewMountDesignSpec
  :Questionable. There is some debate about whether users are still using this option, or are using autofs instead.
  43 KB (6,771 words) - 17:03, 2 November 2007
• Printk cleanup
  abused (remote hosts and unprivileged local users shouldn't be able to spam the logs), developing some uniform policies, and
  638 B (102 words) - 13:54, 29 August 2007
• Open causes oops instead of EPERM
  $ touch /net/users/daniel/foo $ sudo chmod 0 /net/users/daniel/foo
  2 KB (287 words) - 16:15, 22 October 2010
• Server export issues
  ...so a mountpoint. We should fix this. (We should also discourage this, as users rarely seem to understand the associated filehandle-guessing attacks.)
  3 KB (539 words) - 19:47, 15 December 2020